Ultimately, photography is about story. When photographing wildlife, especially for documentation purposes, it is important that the story is true. It used to be that insect photographers, limited by primitive cameras, would chill the insects and then place the insect on the substrate of the photographer’s choosing. The resultant photographs were similar to a paparazzi photo of your favorite celeb exiting a party at 3 am. Sure, you could recognize the celeb, but it looked all weird and the pose was off due to inebriation. Insects may be on plants that they would not perch on, weird positions, etc. In the mid 1990’s I first saw tiger beetle photographs by Chris Brown, and it is was obvious – these were real photos of actual beetles living their lives. I was super impressed. Ten years later I met Chris and asked him about his photos and truth, he smiled and responded about slithering through mud on his belly. His photos made me reevaluate my own insect photography through the lens of truth.
Back in the day film photography was expensive and without a dark room not much post processing was available. Digital photography changed all that and offers cropping, enlarging, color enhancement, light balancing, and even photo shop magic. It is kind of cool to make a photograph more pleasing to the through editing tools, but always remember that you are editing in the service of truth. However, I feel it is important to try to take photographs that don’t require all of that extra post processing. So I try to compose a decent photo before snapping photos. Unfortunately, birds and insects can be very wary, usually I snap a first shot and then try to get one or more pleasing shots. However, even the act of photo composition can be a lie. Perhaps the animal is deformed, but in your photo you shoot the ‘good’ side. Or perhaps you in trying for a good shot have caused the animal to move from where it was comfortable.
I recently had an opportunity to photograph a very cooperative Vanessa atalanta. I took the first shot and thought I was done because Anacostia Riverpup is always curious about what I am interested in. Because we had just finished a run on the park trails, she just sat down. So I was free to pursue more photos. I got down low and tried using the ground as a tripod, but there was grass in the way, so slowly and smoothly I removed grass blades in the way until I was able to take the final photo. When Anacostia and I backed out and then stood up, the butterfly still had not moved. We did change the habitat a bit, but we did not move the insect or change the immediate surroundings (the grass blades removed were 7cm or more from the butterfly). I think I have have stayed true here, but I find that I often will manipulate vegetation (bend a leaf out of the way, etc), which could be stretching the truth.
The goal is to share the beauty and wonder I feel during an encounter, but also to stay within the truth, and also to do this without putting a burden on the animal or its habitat. As cameras, software, and AI change to make photography more rewarding for photographers it may mean that some aspects of truth become obscured or that photographers may have to adjust factory settings to capture the truth of the situation. In the meantime, get out, take some photos of what amazes you, and share them.